/ Print /

  • linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    Three EHR challenges hindering value-based reimbursement


    The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) has rocketed to the top of the list of near-term regulatory challenges for healthcare providers. Because MACRA addresses healthcare payments, quality, and information technology (IT), understanding and complying with it demands attention from clinicians, administrators and IT professionals alike.

    Even under ideal circumstances, the shift to value-based reimbursement espoused by MACRA would be challenging—and circumstances are far from ideal. For one thing, there is uncertainty surrounding the American Health Care Act (AHCA), which is rattling around in Congress. Just as significantly, healthcare still is dealing with its last IT mega-challenge: adoption and effective use (not to be confused with Meaningful Use) of electronic health records (EHR) systems.

    A recent survey found that nearly two-thirds of all physicians feel unprepared to manage and execute MACRA. This is understandable, given that so many physicians continue to wrestle with poor usability and related workflow implications of EHRs, and hospital IT organizations continue to place “EHR optimization” above MACRA implementation on their priority lists.

    There are multiple factors contributing to the EHR distraction. As one media outlet reported recently, “Many people blame the HITECH Act and its meaningful use EHR program for incentivizing software vendors to craft products that meet the federal government’s specific criteria at the expense of innovative features and functionality.” The article quoted a health IT industry executive who stated, “In many cases, EHRs that were designed pre-MU, and originally had high user satisfaction, were redesigned to obtain MU subsidies and, subsequently, user satisfaction dropped.”

    Here are three EHR-related challenges that are impeding the advancement of IT support for value-based reimbursements:

    1. Mandated use. EHRs are everywhere, but liked (at least by physicians) practically nowhere. Thanks to Meaningful Use, nearly 96% of hospitals are now using a certified EHR platform. Regardless of where a physician practices, they have to use the technology, like it or not.

    2. End-user frustrations. Regardless of the high-adoption numbers, EHRs still place a heavy productivity burden on physicians. In theory, EHRs should make providers more efficient, streamline their workflow, and allow them to spend more time with patients. Instead, EHRs are the number one frustration of physicians today.

    3. Increase in costs. According to Deloitte’s 2016 survey of U.S. physicians, three out of four doctors believe EHRs increase costs, outweighing any efficiency savings. Seven out of 10 also believe that EHRs reduce their productivity.

    Next: What can be done


    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • No comments available

    Follow Us On Twitter

    Find us on Facebook

    Latest Tweets Follow